<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: RetroReview : The NES January Classic Part 4	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://retrosection.com/2012/retro-reviews/retroreview-the-nes-january-classic-part-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://retrosection.com/2012/retro-reviews/retroreview-the-nes-january-classic-part-4/</link>
	<description>Bringing Past To Present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:23:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: RetroBear		</title>
		<link>https://retrosection.com/2012/retro-reviews/retroreview-the-nes-january-classic-part-4/#comment-587</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RetroBear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retrosection.com/?p=939#comment-587</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comment, and am in agreement with you. I don&#039;t see the point in going over old ground with games that have been commented on millions of times before. It&#039;s true you have to go through a lot of bad games to get the gems amongst the countless others but it&#039;s well worth it !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, and am in agreement with you. I don&#8217;t see the point in going over old ground with games that have been commented on millions of times before. It&#8217;s true you have to go through a lot of bad games to get the gems amongst the countless others but it&#8217;s well worth it !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geeksleek		</title>
		<link>https://retrosection.com/2012/retro-reviews/retroreview-the-nes-january-classic-part-4/#comment-581</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geeksleek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retrosection.com/?p=939#comment-581</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Finally a list of NES games that doesn&#039;t include Zelda! Thanks for pointing out these games, because I honestly have not played most of them before. It&#039;s time to hit eBay and do some shopping I guess.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally a list of NES games that doesn&#8217;t include Zelda! Thanks for pointing out these games, because I honestly have not played most of them before. It&#8217;s time to hit eBay and do some shopping I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
